>

May 10th, 2013
thesmithian

Joe Biden…must be considering a presidential run. There will be too much Obama-era unfinished business—implementing the Affordable Care Act, fighting for climate-change initiatives, for example—for Biden to throw in the towel. His strengths as a candidate are his blue-collar persona, family values, lifetime support of labor unions and farmers, foreign-policy expertise and stouthearted belief that the Obama administration’s record of accomplishment…has been historic. With Air Force Two at his disposal and his two superbright sons, Hunter and Beau, probably working as his chief advisers, Biden can give Hillary Clinton a run for her money. Although she will have an unquestioned advantage among women, it’s not inconceivable to think that labor unions, environmentalists, African-Americans, LGBT voters and small-business owners will prefer the hypercaffeinated, hard-charging vice president. Like Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, a presumed Republican candidate, Biden has learned to turn the sound-bite culture on its head by speaking from the gut. Though he’s been a major political player since the Nixon years, Biden has pulled off the trick of not seeming like politics-as-usual. It could be a mistake to underestimate his populist appeal. And it’s hard to imagine that this highly ambitious man will choose not to pursue the office he’s wanted all his life.

more, plus the talk with Vice President Biden, here.



May 7th, 2013
thesmithian

“Our climate is changing, the weather is becoming more intense…It’s going to cost a lot of money and a lot of lives…The big issue (is) how do we adapt…because it doesn’t look like the people who are in charge are going to do what it takes to really slow down this climate change, so we are going to have to adapt. And adapting is going to be very, very expensive.”

California Governor Jerry Brown

…in an airplane hangar filled with trucks, airplanes and helicopters used by the state to fight fires.

May 7th, 2013
thesmithian

[President] Obama didn’t change the weltanschauung. He does, however, deserve credit for doing a great deal within its constraints. Climate hawks should not waste their time hoping for a Great Man (or Woman) to save the day in the next election. No one person, no matter how brave or clever, can turn the tide. The impediments to climate action in the U.S. are primarily structural and systemic; systems thinking, not Romantic tales of individual heroism, is what’s needed.

more, here. which is in response to this.

May 4th, 2013
thesmithian

‘The science proving human-caused climate change is overwhelming. Republicans overwhelmingly ignore and deny what the science proves…’

May 4th, 2013
thesmithian

Many…have written about how global warming will damage some of the world’s most treasured landscapes and beloved species. This book aims to lay out exactly how bad it will be for human beings.

more.

Many…have written about how global warming will damage some of the world’s most treasured landscapes and beloved species. This book aims to lay out exactly how bad it will be for human beings.

more.

April 29th, 2013
thesmithian

“We have always been able to depend upon a constant shoreline. It’s going to be a hard lesson to learn. This is a new planet we are living on.”

more.

April 20th, 2013
thesmithian

…more and more writers have begun to set their novels and short stories in worlds, not unlike our own, where the Earth’s systems are noticeably off-kilter. The genre has come to be called climate fiction—”cli-fi,” for short.

more.

April 13th, 2013
thesmithian

Hurricane Sandy raises big questions about how we will live in the future. A city mayor…cannot stand up amid the wreckage and tell people that everything is fine, that it will never happen again. Today we face an ecological challenge of our own making: now that the majority of us live in cities, it is within the metropolis that our future salvation or death warrant will be drafted. For some geographers the future looks bleak.

more.

April 3rd, 2013
thesmithian
If we do not act to curb climate change immediately, we will leave our children and grandchildren an unrecognizable planet…It is the poor, those least responsible for climate change and least able to afford adaptation, who would suffer the most.
Jim Yong Kim, head of the World Bank
April 2nd, 2013
thesmithian

…in 1988, Hansen was early and aggressive in speaking out about global warming. His opponents dubbed him an “alarmist.” Even some colleagues who agreed with him in principle shrank from taking an aggressive public posture, when the evidence for modern anthropogenic global warming was not as clear-cut as it is today. Nevertheless, Hansen’s bold predictions have proven true.

more.

…in 1988, Hansen was early and aggressive in speaking out about global warming. His opponents dubbed him an “alarmist.” Even some colleagues who agreed with him in principle shrank from taking an aggressive public posture, when the evidence for modern anthropogenic global warming was not as clear-cut as it is today. Nevertheless, Hansen’s bold predictions have proven true.

more.

March 20th, 2013
thesmithian
I don’t think the GOP is in that much trouble. (And, twice in 20 years now, we’ve seen how deftly they can disrupt the administrations of the people who beat them.) They’ve locked up the House for the foreseeable future. They’re getting all kinds of laws past in the states that would have been unthinkable even a decade ago. They’ve stacked the courts to the point where the DC circuit can rule against recess appointments, and where it looks like the teeth of the Voting Rights Act are about to be pulled. The entire economic debate is being fought out on ground only a smidge to the left of their own choosing. Sensible gun control turns out to be DOA, at least in part because Democratic politicians are afraid of mighty Republican ad buys in contestable states. Campaign finance is a a dead parrot, and the system in situ is vastly to their advantage. Real action on climate change is utterly stalled. So, with all that, the RNC does a little examination of conscience about why they’ve lost the popular vote in six of the past seven presidential elections, and everybody goes into high-sterics, as my mother used to say.
Charles P. Pierce, at Esquire
March 14th, 2013
thesmithian
If you have a senator or a congressman in a swing district who is prepared to take a tough vote—or what they consider to be a tough vote—on immigration reform, or legislation around background checks for guns, I want to make sure that they feel supported and that they know that there are constituencies of theirs who agree with them, even if they may be getting a lot of pushback in that district. If we move aggressively on an issue like climate change—that’s not an easy issue for a lot of folks, because the benefits may be out in the future. And I want to make sure that a congressman, senator feels as if they’ve got the information and the grassroots network that’s going to support them in that effort…I’ve always said that I am representing people, and that change comes about because people are activated, people are involved. People shape the agenda. People determine the framework for debate. People let their members of Congress know what is that they believe. And when those voices are heard, you can’t stop it. That’s when change happens.
President Obama, yesterday in Washington DC at an Organizing for America event.
March 4th, 2013
thesmithian
I hate the sequester, beginning with its name. “Sequester” is a verb, not a noun. This ridiculous exercise is not just unwise and unproductive but ungrammatical as well. I hate the way the sequester diverts attention from issues that actually matter, such as unemployment, gun violence, climate change, failing schools and the need to spur economic growth. I hate the way it heightens our insularity at a time when we really ought to be paying attention to the rest of the world. Remember Syria?
Eugene Robinson, at the Washington Post
February 28th, 2013
thesmithian

Named for its high-pitched calls…the coquí is the generic name for some 14 species of frog…Three of the species have gone extinct since the 1970s…scientists fear that the remaining 14 will also disappear unless the authorities take quick action to preserve more land and to slow rising temperatures…Loss of the coquís would be unsettling for Puerto Rico, where the frogs’ image can be found on everything from T-shirts to key rings…Because the frogs feed on mosquitoes, the decline of the tiny amphibians will mean that humans will be more exposed to mosquito-borne diseases…

more.

Loading tweets...

@danamo

culture is politics. politics is culture.
[beta]

Networks

Following