>

February 11th, 2013
thesmithian

Rubio is…a politician of unusual gifts. But the spotlight that has fallen on this relatively new arrival to the national scene says as much about the state of the Republican Party as it does about the 41-year-old senator. And it remains to be seen whether he represents the solution to the GOP’s problems, or whether the party’s sky-high hopes in an untested newcomer are just another measure of its drift. His appeal starts with the fact that Rubio embodies two demographic groups with which the GOP needs to connect: young people and Hispanics.

more.

+++++

art: drawing by Carlos Pijeira

October 25th, 2012
thesmithian

‘Birtherism. Immigration reform. Jeremiah Wright. The Herman Cain campaign. Marco Rubio. The Obama Phone.’

…Issues pertaining to race and ethnicity have been incredibly important to the 2012 election…But almost all the people covering those stories have been white, according to an analysis by 4th Estate…The media analysis organization looked at who’s writing front-page stories for major papers, including a breakdown by broad topic area. It found that 93 percent of page one articles on the election were written by white reporters, with Asian Americans writing 3.3 percent, blacks writing just under 3 percent, and Hispanics penning 0.7 percent. In contrast, the numbers among the general population are 56.1 percent white, 16.3 percent Hispanic, about 5 percent Asian, and 12.6 percent black…

more.

November 14th, 2010
thesmithian

…in most of the top races across the country, among Latino voters Democrats beat Republicans by nearly a 2-1 margin.  Only in Florida, where Cuban-Americans traditionally favor Republicans,  were some GOP candidates able to surpass Democrats among Latinos…In many races in which the Republican winner was a Latino—with one  exception being the Florida U.S. Senate race, in which Cuban-American  Marco Rubio was elected with 55 percent of the Hispanic vote — the  majority of the Hispanic vote went for the Democrat….It happened in New Mexico, where Republican and immigration  hard-liner Susana Martinez was elected governor—the first Latina in  that position—without the majority of the Hispanic vote. It happened  in Nevada, where Brian Sandoval—another anti-immigrant advocate—became the first Latino governor, without the majority of the Hispanic  vote. And it happened in various congressional races in which Latino  Republican candidates sold their souls to the racist and xenophobic  anti-immigrant movement just to get elected.

and so, Miguel Perez goes on to say:

They are Hispanic, and they are elected leaders. But seeing as the  new crop of Latino Republicans mostly were elected by non-Latinos —  because majorities of Hispanics often voted against them — can we call  them Latino leaders? If they have vowed to follow conservative Republican/tea party  agendas that are clearly anti-Hispanic, can we really call them Latino  leaders just because they have Hispanic surnames?

 

…in most of the top races across the country, among Latino voters Democrats beat Republicans by nearly a 2-1 margin. Only in Florida, where Cuban-Americans traditionally favor Republicans, were some GOP candidates able to surpass Democrats among Latinos…In many races in which the Republican winner was a Latino—with one exception being the Florida U.S. Senate race, in which Cuban-American Marco Rubio was elected with 55 percent of the Hispanic vote — the majority of the Hispanic vote went for the Democrat….It happened in New Mexico, where Republican and immigration hard-liner Susana Martinez was elected governor—the first Latina in that position—without the majority of the Hispanic vote. It happened in Nevada, where Brian Sandoval—another anti-immigrant advocate—became the first Latino governor, without the majority of the Hispanic vote. And it happened in various congressional races in which Latino Republican candidates sold their souls to the racist and xenophobic anti-immigrant movement just to get elected.

and so, Miguel Perez goes on to say:

They are Hispanic, and they are elected leaders. But seeing as the new crop of Latino Republicans mostly were elected by non-Latinos — because majorities of Hispanics often voted against them — can we call them Latino leaders? If they have vowed to follow conservative Republican/tea party agendas that are clearly anti-Hispanic, can we really call them Latino leaders just because they have Hispanic surnames?

 

September 16th, 2010
thesmithian
Such opposing views Between Tea Partiers and Hispanics are exemplified by the recent decision by Marco Rubio in Florida, a Tea Party darling, to “distance himself from the Tea Party” and seek a more moderated position on key issues for Hispanics…Now that Rubio is in 3-way race, Rubio wants to focus more on pressing issues for independents and Hispanics in Florida. This shift on tone by Rubio is important because, unlike Alaska, Kentucky, and Nevada where Tea Party Candidates have won, Florida is large heavily Hispanic populated and a moderate state. Similarly California, Texas, and Florida are all Hispanics states and highly populated, and the most taxed per-capita, yet Tea Party candidates were rejected. Conversely, Alaska—a “welfare state“—Kentucky and Nevada, states that have chosen Tea Party senatorial candidate(s), are rural and heavily subsidized states.

Somos Republicans’ Alex Gonzales, conservative political analyst/commentator

via HHR

Loading tweets...

@danamo

culture is politics. politics is culture.
[beta]

Networks

Following