>

May 21st, 2013
thesmithian

‘Too bad that Republicans don’t sing the praises of the First Amendment when the White House is held by the G.O.P. In fact, they do the exact opposite…’

…In fact, they did the exact opposite when the Republican administration does the exact same thing that is now at the center of the Obama scandal involving the Associated Press—that is, seizing phone records of reporters. (Please note: The issue here isn’t whether they are right or wrong. What I’m talking about is the utter hypocrisy of the G.O.P. on this matter.) Let’s take the most important disclosure of a classified program that occurred in my lifetime: the 2005 article in The New York Times that revealed the existence of the program to allow the government to wiretap Americans and others in the United States without a warrant if it was part of a national-security investigation. Somehow, I don’t remember Republicans banging the First Amendment drum when that story came out— instead, they were calling for reporters to be charged with treason, which could have led to them being executed.

bold, ours. more, here.

May 19th, 2013
thesmithian
…no real connection has been directly made between these scandals and the president. And, I’d say, he’s buoyed somewhat because the economy here is better than any in Europe—and less vulnerable than Japan’s current Keynesian jolt—and because he’s still a broadly liked president…the press corps needed a storyline, rather than just three stories. But sometimes the line falls apart for lack of evidence (at least among the non-GOP base).

Andrew Sullivan, at TDD, in regard to the fact that

CNN finds what Gallup does: no impact on the president’s approval ratings, even as Americans do take the current scandals seriously

May 17th, 2013
thesmithian
The right thing to do here is for ABC to reveal the source that fed it bogus information. This is what should happen for two reasons: 1) it should happen to demonstrate the consequences of feeding bogus information to ABC, and 2) it should happen to demonstrate that there is something of a campaign among Republican congressional staffers to wound an elected president with bogus information, because (as I think we would all agree) that’s a helluva news story, too. (Those of us who remember ABC’s performance during Whitewater are not optimistic, by the way.) Ball’s in your court, folks. Who do you really serve? The country, or the liars in your BlackBerries?
Charles P. Pierce, at Esquire
May 17th, 2013
thesmithian
…no matter what a reporter is willing to do, if a government is willing to subpoena her phone records, then sources are going to be less willing to talk—it’s the chilling effect, a cliché but a truth, too. And it’s an effect that can take hold deeply and perniciously in an atmosphere of national threat. We can’t let it, because this particular threat—terrorism—and the war on it are open-ended. We could be suspending our civil liberties forever.
Margaret Talbot, at the New Yorker
May 16th, 2013
thesmithian
In fact, we are witnessing the resegregation of the American media.
Farai Chideya, at The Nation
May 16th, 2013
thesmithian

‘On Tuesday, it looked like we had three possible political scandals brewing. Two days later, with much more evidence available, it doesn’t look like any of them will pan out…’

…There’ll be more hearings, and more bad press for the Obama administration, and more demands for documents. But—and this is a key qualification—absent more revelations, the scandals that could reach high don’t seem to include any real wrongdoing, whereas the ones that include real wrongdoing don’t reach high enough.

more.

May 16th, 2013
thesmithian

‘Following months of media calls for deficit reduction, cable news channels spent just over 7 minutes reporting on a revised Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projection that the 2013 deficit will decline by more than previous estimates…’

May 15th, 2013
thesmithian

‘…someone initiated an outrageous abuse of IRS powers. We need to find out who and how and fire those who went over the line…’

…And this genuine scandal is tied to the non-scandal of Benghazi and the genuine debate about how far the DOJ should go in punishing leakers of classified information. Individually, only the IRS affair seems a genuine scandal…But drama is the stuff of pageviews. And the chattering classes can only take a no-drama president for so long.

more.

May 9th, 2013
thesmithian
…it’s getting to the point where, if another pundit tells me that the president’s primary failure is that he hasn’t been able to persuade congressional vandals to drop their spray-paint cans and back slowly away from the subway car of government, I might start sending Rahm Emanuel a card every year on Political Carnivores Day.
Charles P. Pierce, at Esquire.
May 9th, 2013
thesmithian

‘I’m not a Benghazi expert. I’m willing to entertain the possibility that there’s something here that the media aren’t telling me. But before I evaluate the case, I need to see some concrete charges. My challenge to conservatives is to tell me, very simply, the following:’

(1) What, in your view, was the crime?

(2) Who failed competently to perform his or her job, in which concrete ways?

(3) What information was covered up, and how? …

more from Andrew Sahl.

May 6th, 2013
thesmithian
I do not believe that partisan polarization makes dysfunctional gridlock likely. It’s not partisan polarization that’s the problem; it’s the broken, radical Republican Party. Essentially, party polarization isn’t nearly as important as the array of problems within the GOP—antagonism to compromise as an organizing principle; a closed information loop dominated by the Republican-aligned press; a conservative marketplace which blunts the electoral incentive for much of the party; and loss of interest in and capacity for public policy. Without those internal dysfunctions, even an extremely conservative Republican Party would be able to cut deals and allow the political system to function relatively smoothly even with divided government…
Loading tweets...

@danamo

culture is politics. politics is culture.
[beta]

Networks

Following